![]() ![]() I initially thought I might upgrade to another cordless model. It’s much more aesthetically pleasing in its design compared to old countertop models, and comes in several different color options now including matte plastic finishes that are not glossy. The WP-660 is a little smaller than old countertop models. ![]() The counter top models have a higher maximum pressure than the cordless models.The water capacity of the built in reservoir on the WP-360 is too small and you run out of water while using it and need to refill it.Plugging in the bulky charger and unplugging was a bit of a hassle.After many years the battery life of the WP-360 was not as good.There are a few reasons why I switched from the cordless WP-360 to the countertop WP-660: Less clunky – the old counter top models were large and clunky and were aesthetically unpleasing.Less counter space – the cordless model takes up less counter space.Easier to use – there is no cord getting in the way, no extra features, just turn it on and off.There are a few reasons why I switched from a countertop model like the WP-100 to the cordless WP-360: If you have an old Waterpik and are wondering if there have been any significant design improvements, the answer is yes. Now I have moved on to their WP-660 countertop model (second to left in above image). Then I moved on to their current WP-360 cordless model (left most in the image above). Years ago I used Waterpiks similar to their current WP-72 and WP-100 countertop models (not pictured above).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |